tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1689696063251385581.post3551850316510785130..comments2023-09-15T02:46:50.881-07:00Comments on Ace Baker's 9/11 Research - WMD at the WTC: A Few Quick Comments on Nat Geo Hit PieceAce Bakerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05252786712292468442noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1689696063251385581.post-72176068121110972882010-10-09T09:09:35.474-07:002010-10-09T09:09:35.474-07:00You're right, the single beam was a poor repre...You're right, the single beam was a poor representation of a WTC floor. The twin tower floors were a corrugated steel pan, filled with steel-reinforced concrete, and held up by steel trusses. <br /><br />Moreover, the test was irrelevant. Even if a fire could cause a floor to fail, so what? Even assuming the structure magically disappears at one story, how does a falling top part turn the bottom part into microscopic powder and spread it all over lower Manhattan?Ace Bakerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05252786712292468442noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1689696063251385581.post-43197547728700103782010-10-09T02:24:15.780-07:002010-10-09T02:24:15.780-07:00I've seen this a few times now (it was on agai...I've seen this a few times now (it was on again this year), and I can't help but laugh at the way they try to debunk the 'conspiracy theory' by showing highly flawed tests.<br />In the experiment with the beam across the fire pit, I would have thought that it would be more acurate to have the beam anchored at both ends and then surrounded by concrete, instead of just loosely lying across the fire.<br />Secondly, In the experiment with the projectile, they showed a cylinder punching it's way through concrete blocks (apparently an accurate portrayal of the pentagon). However, they do not use an accurate representation of the plane. If a plane hit the pentagon, then there should be at least 2 holes in the walls where the engines punched through. To me, what they showed was evidence that a missile or UAV could have caused the hole but did not show that a plane could have.John Arnottnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1689696063251385581.post-53530498817289006762009-09-11T11:24:34.889-07:002009-09-11T11:24:34.889-07:00Conventional buildings can be imploded because the...Conventional buildings can be imploded because they are a grid of vertical and horizontal structural members. By planning which joints are shattered by cutter charges the intact joints will "pull" sections of the structure in the desired direction to avoid damage to surrounding structures and property. Usually the joints in the center are blown as the building starts to fall to "pull" the walls in and dump the building in its footprint. <br /><br />In a tube structure, the lightweight trusses between inner core and outer walls do not have the strength to be able to do this, and also the height of the buildings would make conventional implosion impossible even if it were a conventional "cubic" structure.<br /><br />We see the towers fall apart, however, the steel and other materials in the towers is indeed being imploded at the atomic level. We are left with ash.<br /><br />The atom is 99.99999% vacuum, so there is plenty of room to implode atoms of steel with the technology based on a more correct understanding of Quantum Physics, which is really no different than Macro Physics if you understand the nature of the vacuum and gravity.<br /><br />Thanks and Blessings to you.<br /><br />9/11/9Shallelnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1689696063251385581.post-26625364318864345612009-09-07T07:00:41.212-07:002009-09-07T07:00:41.212-07:00Not buying it. The fact that there is very little ...Not buying it. The fact that there is very little mass left in the footprint is the single best proof of demolition. Getting the truthers to argue that the towers fell down in their footprint was one of the best tricks ever. <br /><br />It's a perfect example of asking the wrong question. They got us asking "Why did the towers fall down in their footprints?" instead of asking, "How much of the towers landed inside the footprint?"Ace Bakerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05252786712292468442noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1689696063251385581.post-40098293196141235742009-09-07T00:14:13.357-07:002009-09-07T00:14:13.357-07:00I was always under the impression that the reason ...I was always under the impression that the reason David Ray Griffin is fond of describing the towers as having 'imploded' is because of that word's association with controlled demolition. When a building is demolished, it's technically an implosion that occurs, so I figured that was why he says that.. simply to draw those associations in the minds of his audience.The Gibroney Hunterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04666436761145511008noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1689696063251385581.post-37307238622129865232009-09-02T20:47:58.273-07:002009-09-02T20:47:58.273-07:00Griffin is steering people to want a new investiga...Griffin is steering people to want a new investigation? Why? Why would a new one turn out any different than the last 3?<br /><br />Please. Griffin does a reasonable job of going halfway. He's a classic limited hangout, and his great conclusion for everything:<br /><br />Global Democracy. I.e, one world government. I.e. New World Order.Ace Bakerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05252786712292468442noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1689696063251385581.post-52596494150433206612009-09-02T19:36:38.567-07:002009-09-02T19:36:38.567-07:00April 11, 2009 - David Ray Griffin
David Ray Griff...April 11, 2009 - David Ray Griffin<br />David Ray Griffin speaks at Boston University<br />http://davidraygriffin.com/calendar/april-11-2009-boston/<br />Please watch David Ray Griffin’s lecture at Boston University on April 11, 2009 (9/11, Time For a Second Look) . Dr. Griffin meticulously presents the case for a new investigation of the 9/11 attacks–the 9/11 Commission Report on the “official” conspiracy theory is full of contradictions and apparent lies.<br /><br />Was America Attacked by Muslims on 9/11?<br />http://davidraygriffin.com/articles/was-america-attacked-by-muslims-on-911/Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13158235125803521831noreply@blogger.com