Monday, June 4, 2012

9/11 - The Great American Psy-Opera

9/11 - The Great American Psy-Opera

A scientific, historical, and musical exploration of 9/11 by Ace Baker.
Chapters 1-8 are now free on YouTube.


If you think planes crashed into the twin towers, see chapter 6 "What Planes?" and chapter 7 "The Key". Carefully considered, real plane crashes are impossible, and the evidence for video compositing is irrefutable.

If you think the towers were brought down by thermite and/or directed energy weapons, please see Chapter 4 "Phenomena". The evidence for nuclear reactions is overwhelming.

If you think there was a gravity collapse, or are inclined to believe any part of the ridiculous official story, please see chapter 2 "The Official Story vs. The Truth Movement".

If you're interested in the psychological aspects of false flag terror, please see chapter 8 "The Psy-Opera".

If you think the leaders of the "truth" movement are seeking the truth, please wait for chapter 9 "The Controlled Opposition".

If you want to know what actually occurred on 9/11, please wait for chapter 10 "Conclusion".



28 comments:

justinl said...

Ace.. good to see you back.. You don't think there was molten metal on 9/11 do you?

spooked said...

would love to see the last two chapters!!!

Jan Abraham said...

You should intview Dimitri Khalezov! He is the guy who knows how they blow up the WTCs. It was an 150 kt underground nuclear expolison. Here is a over 4 h interview where he explains many things in detail:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lec9giab90I

Every secret service try to put in into a jim.

http://911.bplaced.net said...

First I want to tell you that I find the Psy Opera very well done and I appreciate your work. It's a great form of dispute with the topic. Thank you.

So far, I wanted to not deal with the fact that there were no planes in NY, but now ... ;).

I searched your blog because I wanted to give you a hint to "The Third Truth", exactly as Jan Abraham did ^^.


Best regards from Germany

Jan Abraham said...

Yeah thank you for posting another comment with a better grammer as I have. ^^ So pls Ace check out Dimitris 3rd thruth. :)You did one of the best and biggest research don't stop it without Dimitris "theorie".

Ace Baker said...

Dimitri Khalezov is surely another disinfo agent. In the most general sense, he is correct about nukes being used on the WTC. However, he ignores most of the crucial evidence for nuclear reactions (see Psy-Opera, esp. Ch 4 "Phenomena"), while advancing the idea that the reactions took place in the basements, which is ridiculous.

Jan Abraham said...

No pls don't miss understand him. You have to know he only tells us HOW they destroy it with the nukes the process he doesn't go trought the other evidences because many other people allready showed them and because he is not an scientis he only hase some basic knowledge about the process while the nukes exploed and what after that with the 5 symptoms of it (EMP, Radioactiviti and so on). And he says the he is an witness of documents wich shows nuclear charges underneath the WTCs to demolish them because at this time the conspirator and people who build WTC 1 and 2 know that they need an demolish system but it can't be an conventional one. And listen to Dimitri HOW they demolish the buildings and you will see it makes sense. I mean you can't tell him an disinfo agent without listin to that what he says. And if you look at some texts about underground nuclear explosions you will see that it is the same as Dimitri tells us. And you saw the huge cravity UNDERNEATH the basement. You only should take a look at Dimitris knowledge if you want to know HOW it happend. Pls don't call him disinfo agent he really isn't. And Jim Fetzer also did an interview with him and says it makes sense and many other people also. And he also think that Judy Woods and Steven Jones theroy is ridiculous and tells us why they don't used a mini nuke or any other nuke but an underground nuclear explosion. Look at his files http://www.911-truth.net/. And I mean for a disinfo agent, it's pretty strange that many secret services try to shout his mouth.

Ace Baker said...

So why, exactly, are we supposed to think the reaction was in the basement?

Jan Abraham said...

Okay well I could answer you some and the most importants questions but maybe we could chat? I have Skype and I think it would be better as writing an comment every second day ^^. Or you contact Dimitri so you can ask him before I say something wrong. But to answer your question. First of all, there was an explosion (not a huge reaction as you maybe mention) of a huge underground nuclear explosion UNDERNEATH the basement. There was no mini nuke in the upper part of the building or in the basement or a reactor in the basement or underneath it. Because the china symddrome only appears if a reactor gets uncontrolled. And a reactor didn't explode and it will never cause an building to get pulverised and would never cause the mashroom cloud. And a mini nuke at the upper part of the buildinng or only in the basement would cause an air blast wave, ionizing radiation, thermal radiation, radioactive contamination and a EMP. But we only got the last 3 symdroms and the EMP wasn't that big. And a mini nuke has not enough 'power' to pulverise the building in such a way we saw it. And a mini nuke underneath the basement also didn't have enough power and would not cause the huge cavity underneath the basement as we saw it. SO there is no other way as an underground nuclear explosion and he also shows you that he was an millitary officer and knows as a witness that there was such a bomb underneath the basement (he shows that also in the interview). And you should inform yourself about Dimitris theory before I answer your question about the collapse were the top part fell first. You have to know the diffrence between the process of an undergound nuclear explosion and an atmospheric nuclear explosion. And THEN I or Dimtri can answer your other questions (he explains that in his 4 h interview complete in detail and he also answer the question about the collapse). And you have to know why (as I write to you at the beginning) there was no mini nuke or reactor he explain that in his free 11 chapter E - Book and also a bit in his interview.

Ace Baker said...

Khalezov's 500 page book does not contain the word "tritium". I suggest that this is because Khalezov is a fraud. Can you suggest another explanation?

Jan Abraham said...

Did I post my answer? xD

Jan Abraham said...

Okay I think I didn't post my answer sorry :S. But anyway. As I told you he isn't a scientist and he also wrote HIS own evidences to proof that there was a nuclear charge underneath the basement. And he allready sayed some things about the Tritium and so on in this 'debunking the debunkers'article:

http://www.911-truth.net/!_Debunking_the_debunkers_addressing_questions_after_10_Feb_2011_Kevin_Barrett's_interview.pdf

(the debunk article was written by Steven Jones btw). Also, this version of his book isn't the final one. He will release it as soon as he gets a publisher and as soon as he find a the last dictonary which was printed pre 9/11. (it's very difficult for him to get one for some strange secret service reaseon). And also IT'S SO UNIMPORTANT and unoccupied your claim that he is a fraud BECAUSE HE DIDN'T MENTAION that stuff. YOU also didn't tell us that ground zero in all diconarys pre 9/11 meant: A place where a huge bomb explode or a underground nuclear charge explode! You also didn't mentioned that the dogs who where on 'Ground Zero' died after a week! Too fast for aspect. And you didn't mentioned the FACT of the brown coloration of the cloud after the collapse! Does this means that you are a fraud!? I hope that it doesn't....

Also Ace tell why you don't contact him for an interview maybe? Because all your questions can be answered. And as I also told you before don't put all your attention of ALL his personal opinions. Concentrade yourself on HOW that happends. I mean you did a great work and you get to the point that there was something that is similiar and has to do something with UNDERGROUND nuclear explosions. So that great. BUT NOW you also should explain HOW they used them to demolish the building AND right here Dimitri joins the game!

Or did you have an better explanation for the disctruction of the buildings? Direct Energy Weapons? Mini Nukes? Reactors? Nano Thermite? Convential demolish methods? THESE THINGS ARE and I hate to say that ridiculous!

So tell me AND ALL OF US HOW they done this?

Ace Baker said...

http://acebaker.blogspot.com/2008/09/911-grand-unified-theory.html

Jan Abraham said...

Okay and what are these low yield fission-triggered hydrogen fusion devices in detail?

Do you have any documments of such ... weapons or what ever they are wich support that theory?
And how does it looks like if they explode? And what happend if they explode? Or do they react only? And how and where they are planted?

And are these low yield fission-triggered hydrogen fusion devices not something like a mini - nuke?

Because these devices only can react or they react to explode in milliseconds and if they only react then it would never could cause that to a building but could explain the China Symdrome. But if they react to explode in the atmosphere they would cause an air blast wave and radioactiv contamination and a EMP and also the last 2 syndroms. So Ground Zero and New York would looks like a bit more diffrent. And they could not explain the Spire wich turns to dust after the 'collapse'. In generell it would would not explain the molecular dissocaition because a explosion especially an nuclear would evaporate every thing. A shock wave could explain that just exacly how Dimitri explain it.

Proof me wrong pls, if I say something wrong.

And why do you not believe that all these evidences can also be created by an underground nuclear explosion? (Wich is supportet by many other documents and reports and so on)

But besides of this.
For me it's very sobering that you take interviews with so many 9/11 reseacher but not with Dimitri who has many evidences and many documents that occupy his claims of nuclear explosions.

I mean you contacted Simon Shack and disproofed him. But not a guy who wrote a book with a eyewitness report and with many evidences and with a logical explanation and who is hunted by secret services.
Why? And also if you don't believe him in his 'theory' why you don't do an interview about his other reports as an eyewitness.

Maybe before you answer you should, just like Reynolds said it,:,,PROOF IT UP!´´. Maybe then you will get your next epiphany.

Ace Baker said...

I have given a rigorous proof of video compositing. While video technology is legal and knowable to the general public, nuclear weapons technology is not. Nuclear demolition stands about as proven as it can be. Khalezov never even attempts to explain why he thinks the reaction took place underground. It is simply obvious that the towers were exploded from the top down, in sequence. How could an underground reaction be prevented from destroying the bottom of the tower first?

Jan Abraham said...

Okay that's exactly what I tryed to tell you the whole time. And this question shows me that you didn't read his book or even listen to his interview.

He tells us exactly why they put the nuclear device underneath the basmeant:
1. They used nuclear bombs because there was no other way to demolish these buildings (Mini nukes, Reactors or these other things)
2. they don't wanted the risky air blast wave and the radioactive contamination of NY and no huge EMP
3. a nuclear underground explosion would be the best way ro demolish the buildings quietly and secretly and also to not cause the the air blast wave and the huge EMP
4. all the evidence support his 'theory' completly!

And they fall down from top becuase the first shock wave wich caused the damage zone goes through the tower in milliseconds and first it will only damage the tower and then in mostly the same time it will be pulverised by the crushed zone also in milliseconds. So there were only milliseconds while the lower part gets pulverised.
And the part of the building wich were pulverised by the crushed zone will not fall into dust before there is some pressure. So it has some atomic strength but then the tower fell down because underneath it was nothing. The upper part unddamaged part gaves the presure to break the atomic strength. You can see it at the spaire wich stands dor a while but then it fell into dust but first it stands arround because of his atomic strentgh. You also have to know that the devices were placed more offset from the center of the tower so we saw the corner of the tower and the spire because the shock wave goes unsymmetrically up so there also is some support for the tower in the side were the spire was. And you also can see that the spire fell from the top to the ground and does not disappear from the bottom to the top.

You can see that in the videos:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=Lec9giab90I#t=5932s

first if the building comes down there is debris from the damage zone wich gets pushed out and then there was only dust wich goes up and not down caused by the crushed zone.

Ace Baker said...

Good grief. There is no possible way that a chaotic shock wave from underneath could be controlled in such a way as to cause the building to explode outward in a perfect sequence from top to bottom, as observed.

There is no way the perpetrators would ever risk the possibility that the "collapse" would begin anywhere besides the "airplane damage".

The explosions appear to come from the core of the building, it makes sense that they would be placed from top to bottom in the core.

Khalezov does not attempt to explain why the devices would not be in the core, except to assert that micro nukes don't exist.

The fact of the top-down demolition is so visually obvious that reasonable people will dismiss Khalezov's theory as absurd. The goal, of course, is to get people to dismiss nuclear demolition theory per se. It's the same disinfo strategy used by Lear on no-planes, Jones on conventional demolition, etc.

I'd be more than happy to have a conversation with Khalezov, if you would like to arrange it.

Richard said...

Hi Ace,

You've done a great job on your "The Key" series of videos.

In several of your videos however, you talk about the Chopper 5 wide angle view showing no plane.

Have you not seen the original Chopper 5 footage which clearly shows the plane approaching the towers from more than 7 seconds out?

Ace Baker said...

LOL. There appears to have been an effort to insert a blurry digital airplane into about 3 fields of video, out of more than 200 fields which should have a real airplane.

I've offered $100,000 for an original quality copy of Chopper 5, or any 9/11 airplane video, so that additional analysis can proceed. The fact that there are no takers is quite convincing proof of video fakery, along with all of the other proofs.

Jan Abraham said...

1. No it is possible as I told you before. You can see that on the spire wich falls down form top to bottom and turns to dust. And I explained that shock wave not that good. It's not just like a explosion shock wave it's a ... compression wave wich pulverise everything. But it can not pulverise air so it is controlled in such a way to go only through the building.

2. Yeah they wouldn't and these waves go to the point where the plane chrashes were. And they can calculate the distnace of the wave. And they also could put some other bombs in the damage area to be sure. That'S not a big deal.

3. The wave goes through the core mainly of core. As you can see it in Dimitris explanation.

4. He don't say that they didn't exist. He says and shows us why they wouldn't use them. I also explained that earlier. If you'd actually read his book, then you would know that too. BTW you your loved word Tritium is mentioned in his 500 page book deffently and also in mention it in his 305 page book here:

http://www.911-truth.net/911thology_shortened%20edition_v6-1.zip

And that also answer your question why they wouldn't use them in the core.

5. That's your point of view without even listening to him or reading his book. And as I told you it is completly possible that they fall down from top to bottom as I also told you before. And I also could say: ,, The fact that the top part first drop debris and then there is only pulver and the fact that thee was no air blast wave, thermal radiation or a huge EMP is so visually obvious that reasonable people will dismiss your theory as absurd. The goal, of course, is to get people to dismiss nuclear demolition theory per se. It's the same disinfo strategy used by Lear on no-planes, Jones on conventional demolition, etc.'' See how easy that is?

6. I contact Dimitri on Youtube and some guys who has a better contact to him. They allready informed him. And one of them told me that he will tell me if Dimitri says something to him. And he also told me that he will be buisy for the next weeks and that Dimitri will publish his book in these weeks maybe.

Jan Abraham said...

Oh sry correction:

He will not publish his book maybe, we don't know but he will finish it. ;) And Ace you could also try to contact him with Cipher Wall on his homepage or on youtube:

http://www.youtube.com/user/DimitriKhalezov/videos?view=0.

goodluckwithallthat said...

In the last day I have watched the whole series of films you put together. I first watched "the key", and then started from ch 1-8. I have been a firm disbeliever of the official account as to what happened on 9/11 and, like you, many many times over I have been disgusted with how they lie to us. All along I knew the media and government were complicit in the takedown of the WTC towers. Seeing your documentary resonated highly with me, and I know you're more than on to something. You have more pieces to the puzzle in one place and I thank you for your work. I will never take the MSM seriously again. No fear, eyes open. <3<3 OH! and btw, I thought your music was fantastic. And it was appropriately cheesy at the right times, and excruciatingly moving at times, and informative at times, and sad at times. Number one rule, DON'T LISTEN TO THE TROLLS. I found you, and thankfully I can leave a comment here. Screwtube is a giant sharks tank. <3 please email me if you're on facebook. goodluckwithallthat@gmail.com

Ben said...

Just wanted to say your material is truly truly excellent.

Jonsie said...

Love video series. You are so right. I've been aware of no planes for several years now, but as someone once said its very easy to fool people, but almost impossible to convince them they've been fooled.

Have you ever looked at the website German Engineers Help the USA? It clearly shows the almost identical holes in the towers with Boeing silhouettes superimposed. Even though we supposedly 'saw' planes glide effortlessly into buildings, the plane image doesn't fit in the hole. Columns unbroken, etc. Look at it if you get the chance.

http://www.homoeopathie-online.com/gehu/defaulte.htm

Keep up great work. Jonsie

Peter Hunt said...

Awesome videos by the way - really enjoyed watching them and learnt a lot. The world needs more people like you. Cheers Crazy Pete

castor mason said...

if you really think nukes were involved than either you are not understanding the empirical evidence or you are pys op.....period.

Anonymous said...

Great videos, Ace.

You proved that there were no planes.

But why do not want you to understand what dimitri says?

He can't be a shill, you will see it if you try to look/listen more attentively to all what he says.

Also, just as you perfectly proved that there were no planes that hit the twins, he proved that the pentagon was hit by a soviet/russian missile Granit. This is why NORAD closed the atomic blast doors for the first time in 50 years and started the doomsday plane, because NORAD knew exactly what a flying towards washington Granit missile means.

BTW. if you do not know he is a friend of so called "Merchant of Death" Victor Bout, that means something, do not you think? You can find a couple of photografs on which you can see him and Victor on his internet site http://www.911-truth.net/. Also here is the video from thai prison, you can see him there trying to take photos of Victor, from 2:40 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vw6LqihDAwg, also here at 0:07 he is tallking to Victor https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2FNfkVgixQ.

Good Luck, Ace.

Anonymous said...

Great videos, Ace.

You proved that there were no planes.

But why do not want you to understand what dimitri says?

He can't be a shill, you will see it if you try to look/listen more attentively to all what he says.

Also, just as you perfectly proved that there were no planes that hit the twins, he proved that the pentagon was hit by a soviet/russian missile Granit. This is why NORAD closed the atomic blast doors for the first time in 50 years and started the doomsday plane, because NORAD knew exactly what a flying towards washington Granit missile means.

BTW. if you do not know he is a friend of so called "Merchant of Death" Victor Bout, that means something, do not you think? You can find a couple of photografs on which you can see him and Victor on his internet site http://www.911-truth.net/. Also here is the video from thai prison, you can see him there trying to take photos of Victor, from 2:40 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vw6LqihDAwg, also here at 0:07 he is tallking to Victor https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2FNfkVgixQ.

Good Luck, Ace.